EXPLORING THE MAGNITUDE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON FAMILY COMMUNICATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66104/7k305450

Keywords:

AI, Culture, Communication, Dimensions, Family, Privacy, Society

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has created a plethora of prospects for communication. The study aims to examine the impacts of AI dimensions on family communication. By investigating the multifaceted effects of AI on family communication, this research aims to provide valuable insights, uncover potential concerns, and offer recommendations for both families and society at large in this digital era. A convenience sampling technique was adopted to recruit 300 participants. A linear regression model was measured to examine the impact of AI dimensions which showed a statistically significant effect on accessibility (p = 0.001), personalization (p = 0.001), and language translation (p = 0.0162). The findings showed that in terms of accessibility (p = 0.0057), and language translation (p = 0.010), except personalization (p = 0.1259), there were differences between males and females. However, using multiple AI tools was statistically associated with raising concerns about bias and privacy (p = 0.0146), safety, and dependence (p = 0.0485) of parents. The results showed a lack of knowledge and transparency about the data storage and privacy policy of AI-enabled communication systems. Overall, there was a positive impact of AI dimensions on family communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Dare N. AKINLOYE, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Department of Communication, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

References

Adeniran, A. O., Olaleye, G., and Gbadegesin, A. A. (2026). Influence of Online Reviews on Customer Satisfaction in E-Commerce Logistics Firm: Evidence from TEMU Nigeria. Journal International Review of Research Studies, 1(4), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.66104/vth40547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.66104/vth40547

Adeniran, A. O., Adeniran, A. A., Ogieva, M. O., and Ogwuche, G. (2026). Adoption of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) in Urban Transportation Planning. Discover Global Society, 4(13), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00312-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00312-3

Afifi, T. D., Zamanzadeh,N., Harrison, K., and Callejas,M. A. (2018). WIRED: the impact of media and technology use on stress (cortisol) and inflammation (interleukin IL-6) in fast-paced families. Comput. Hum. Behav. 81, 265 -273. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.010

Ahmad, S. F., Han, H., Alam, M. M., Rehmat,M., Irshad, M., and Arraño-Muñoz, M., (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness, and safety in education. Hum. Soc. Sci. Commun. 10, 1 -14. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01842-4

Akinloye, D. N. (2024a). Communication in divorced families with adult children: a literature review. Annals of Journalism and Mass Communication, 3(1), 70-78

Akinloye, D. N. (2024b).Grandparent-grandchild communication: synthesis of integrative model. Psycology Nexus, 1(1), 1-15

Akinloye, D. N. (2024c). Communication and online platforms: pitfalls, possibilities, and pressures. Texas Tech university. Ttu-ir.tdl.org

Akinloye, D. N. (2025). Communication pattern and the influence of social mediacontents on young adults’ wellbeing in Texas, United States of America. Journal of Communication, 6(2), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/jcomm.3222

Asif, M., and Gouqing, Z. (2024). Innovative application of artificial intelligence in a multi-dimensional communication research analysis: a critical review. Discov. Artif. Intell. 4, 1 -30. doi: 10.1007/s44163-024-00134-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00134-3

Bergert, C., Köster, A., Krasnova, H., and Turel, O. (2020). Missing out on life: parental perceptions of Children's Mobile technology use. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik (Zentrale Tracks),pp. 568 -583). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_f1-bergert

Boden, M. A. (1996). Artificial intelligence. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

Brito, R., and Dias, P. (2020). “Which apps are good for my children?” how the parents of young children select apps. Int. J. Child Comput. Interact. 26:100188. doi: 10.1016/j. ijcci.2020.100188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100188

Butow, P., and Hoque, E. (2020). Using artificial intelligence to analyze and teach communication in healthcare. Breast 50, 49 -55. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.008

Carvalho, J., Francisco, R., and Relvas, A. P. (2015). Family functioning and information and communication technologies: how do they relate?A literature reviews. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 99 -108. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.037

Dattathrani, S., and De, R. (2023). The concept of agency in the era of artificial intelligence: dimensions and degrees. Inf. Syst. Front. 25, 29 -54. doi: 10.1007/ s10796-022-10336-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10336-8

Dawaesar, A. (2013). Life in the digital now. New York: TEDx Talk.

De Lima, R. M., Pisker, B., and Corrêa, V. S. (2023). Gender Bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic review of the literature. J. Telecommun. Digit. Econ. 11, 8 -30. doi: 10.18080/jtde.v11n2.690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v11n2.690

De Togni, G., Erikainen, S., Chan, S., and Cunningham-Burley, S. (2021). What makes AI ‘intelligent’and ‘caring’? Exploring affect and relationality across three sites of

intelligence and care. Soc. Sci. Med. 277:113874. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113874

Druga, S., Christoph, F. L., and Ko, A. J. (2022). Family as a third space for AI literacies: how do children and parents learn about AI together? In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1 -17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502031

Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., and Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59, 96 -104. doi: 10.1145/2818717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717

Galaz, V., Centeno, M. A., Callahan, P. W., Causevic, A., Patterson, T., and Brass, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability. Technol. Soc. 67:101741. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101741

Garg, R., Cui, H., Seligson, S., Zhang, B., Porcheron, M., and Clark, L. (2022). The last decade of HCI research on children and voice-based conversational agents. In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1 -19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502016

Goldenthal, E., Park,J., Liu, S. X., Mieczkowski, H., and Hancock,J. T. (2021). Not all AI are equal: exploring the accessibility of AI-mediated communication technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 125:106975. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106975

Gong, W. J., Wong, B. Y. M., Ho, S. Y., Lai, A. Y. K., Zhao, S. Z., and Wang, M. P. (2021). Family e-chat group use was associated with family well-being and personal happiness in Hong Kong adults amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:9139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179139

Hata, A., Inam, R., Raizer, K., Wang, S., and Cao, E. (2019). AI-based safety analysis for collaborative mobile robots. In: 2019 24th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA),pp. 1722 -1729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869263

Higgins, E. T. (2019). Shared reality: What makes us stronger and tears us apart? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190948054.001.0001

Hodis, G. M., and Hodis, F. A. (2021). Examining motivation predictors of key communication constructs: an investigation of regulatory focus, need satisfaction, and need frustration. Personal. Individ. Differ. 180:110985. doi: 10.1016/j. paid.2021.110985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110985

Hohenstein, J., Kizilcec, R. F., DiFranzo, D., Aghajari, Z., Mieczkowski, H., and Levy, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships. Sci. Rep. 13:5487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30938-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30938-9

Huang, Y. (2022). Construction of an "interactive" English translation teaching model based on data-driven learning. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022, 1 -10. doi: 10.1155/2022/5315110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5315110

Jiang, H. (2022). “Analysis of practice model for translation technology teaching based on artificial intelligence” in SHS web of conferences. eds. X. Pan and S. Zhao, vol. 140 (Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences), 1034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214001034

Jiao, J., Sun, X., Fang, L., and Lyu, J. (2021). An overview of wireless communication technology using deep learning. China Commun. 18, 1 -36. doi: 10.23919/ JCC.2021.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/JCC.2021.12.001

Kesmodel, U. S. (2018). Cross-sectional studies -what are they good for? Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 97, 388 -393. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13331

Koerner, F. A., and Mary Anne, F. (2016). Understanding family communication patterns and family functioning: the roles of conversation orientation and conformity orientation. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 26, 36 -65. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2002.11679010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2002.11679010

Leavy, S. (2018). Gender bias in artificial intelligence: the need for diversity and gender theory in machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on gender equality in software engineering, pp. 14 -16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3195570.3195580

Lee, D., and Yoon, S. N. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry: opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010271

Liao, Q. V., Subramonyam, H., Wang, J., and Wortman Vaughan, J. (2023). Designerly understanding: information needs for model transparency to support design ideation for AI-powered user experience. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1 -21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580652

Liu, Y. L., Huang, L., Yan, W., Wang, X., and Zhang, R. (2022). Privacy in AI and the IoT: the privacy concerns of smart speaker users and the personal information protection law in China. Telecommun. Policy 46:102334. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102334

Manasi, A., Panchanadeswaran, S., Sours, E., and Lee, S. J. (2022). Mirroring the bias: gender and artificial intelligence. Gend. Technol. Dev. 26, 295 -305. doi: 10.1080/09718524.2022.2128254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2128254

Mullan, K., and Chatzitheochari, S. (2019). Changing times together? A time-diary analysis of family time in the digital age in the United Kingdom. J. Marriage Fam. 81, 795 -811. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12564

Murero, M., Vita, S., Mennitto, A., and D'Ancona, G. (2020). Artificial intelligence for severe speech impairment: Innovative approaches to AAC and communication.

Nadeem, A., Abedin, B., and Marjanovic, O. (2020). Gender Bias in AI: A review of contributing factors and mitigating strategies.

Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., Iosifidis, V., Nejdl, W., and Vidal, M. E. (2020). Bias in data-driven artificial intelligence systems - an introductory survey. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. 10:e1356. doi: 10.1002/widm.1356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1356

Park, S., and Lim, Y. K. (2020). Investigating user expectations on the roles of family- shared AI speakers. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1 -13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376450

Peter, J., and Kühne, R. (2018). The new frontier in communication research: why we should study social robots. Media Commun. 6, 73 -76. doi: 10.17645/mac.v6i3.1596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i3.1596

Robinson, W. S. (2014). “Philosophical challenges” in Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. ed. K. Frankish (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 64 -86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046855.005

Schriever, V. (2021). Early childhood teachers’ perceptions and management of parental concerns about their child’s digital technology use in kindergarten. J. Early Child. Res. 19, 487 -499. doi: 10.1177/1476718X211030315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X211030315

Schutz, P. A. (2014). Inquiry on teachers' emotions. Educ. Psychol. 49, 1 -12. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2013.864955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.864955

Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 10, 1 -31. doi: 10.1145/3419764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3419764

Sternberg, R. J. (2000). The Theory of Successful Intelligence. Gifted Education International. 15, 4 -21. doi: 10.1177/026142940001500103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940001500103

Straw, I., and Callison-Burch, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence in mental health and the biases of language-based models. PLoS One 15:e0240376. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0240376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240376

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research. How to choose a sampling technique for research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

Tammisalo, K., and Rotkirch, A. (2022). Effects of information and communication technology on the quality of family relationships: a systematic review. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 39, 2724 -2765. doi: 10.1177/02654075221087942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221087942

Urlaub, P., and Dessein, E. (2022). Machine translation and foreign language education. Front. Artif. Intell. 5:936111. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.936111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.936111

Vincent-Lancrin, S., and Van der Vlies, R. (2020). Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges.

Wald, R., Piotrowski, J. T., Araujo, T., and van Oosten,J. M. (2023). Virtual assistants in the family home. Understanding parents’ motivations to use virtual assistants with their child (dren). Comput. Hum. Behav. 139:107526. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107526

Wang, J., Tang, W., Han, Y., Jin, S., Li, X., and Wen, C. K. (2021). Interplay between RIS and AI in wireless communications: fundamentals, architectures, applications, and open research problems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 39, 2271 -2288. doi: 10.1109/ JSAC.2021.3087259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2021.3087259

Xiao, H., Wang, Z., Tian, W., Liu, X., Liu, W., Jin, S., et al. (2021). AI enlightens wireless communication: analyses, solutions, and opportunities on CSI feedback. China Commun. 18, 104 -116. doi: 10.23919/JCC.2021.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/JCC.2021.11.008

Zhai, C., and Wibowo, S. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 4:100134. doi: 10.1016/j. caeai.2023.100134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100134

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

AKINLOYE, D. N. . (2026). EXPLORING THE MAGNITUDE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON FAMILY COMMUNICATION. Journal International Review of Research Studies, 1(06), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.66104/7k305450